State v. LytleState v. Lytle
The only issue certified to this court by the court of appeals is:
Several statutes set out the requirements and limitations pertaining to sentencing when a firearm specification accompanies a third- or fourth-degree felony count in an indictment. Lytle was convicted of aggravated assault, a violation of
“Except as provided in division (D) of this section, section 2929.71, and Chapter 2925. of the Revised Code, terms of imprisonment for felony shall be imposed as follows:
<<* * *
“(7) For a felony of the fourth degree, the minimum term shall be eighteen months, two years, thirty months, or three years, and the maximum term shall be five years.”
Lytle’s three-year additional sentence for involving a firearm in the commission of a felony was imposed pursuant to
“The court shall impose a term of actual incarceration of three years in addition to imposing a life sentence pursuant to section 2907.02, 2907.12, or 2929.02 of the Revised Code or an indefinite term of imprisonment pursuant tosection 2929.11 of the Revised Code, if both of the following apply:
“(1) The offender is convicted of, or pleads guilty to, any felony other than a violation of section 2923.12 of the Revised Code;
“(2) The offender is also convicted of, or pleads guilty to, a specification charging him with having a firearm on or about his person or under his control while committing the felony. The three-year term of actual incarceration imposed pursuant to this section shall be served consecutively with, and prior to, the life sentence or the indefinite term of imprisonment.”
However, both
“No person shall be sentenced pursuant to division (B)(6) or (7) of this section to an indefinite term of imprisonment for a felony of the third or fourth degree unless the indictment, count in the indictment, or information charging him with the offense contains a specification as set forth in section 2941.143 of the Revised Code.”
“* * * ‘Specification (or, Specification to the First Count). The grand jurors (or insert the person’s or the prosecuting attorney’s name when appropriate) further find and specify that (set forth the allegation either that, during the commission of the offense,*157 the offender caused physical harm to any person, or made an actual threat of physical harm to any person with a deadly weapon, or that the offender has previously been convicted of or pleaded guilty to an offense of violence).’ ” (Emphasis added in part.)
“No person shall be sentenced pursuant to division (A) of this section unless the indictment, count in the indictment, or information charging him with the offense contains a specification as set forth in section 2941.141 of the Revised Code.”
“* * * Specification (or, Specification to the First Count). The Grand Jurors (or insert the person’s or the prosecuting attorney’s name when appropriate) further find and specify that (set forth that the offender had a firearm on or about his person or under his control while committing the offense).” (Emphasis added in part.)
The import of
We disagree with the Tyson interpretation of the statutes examined above. In the case before us, as in Tyson, the indictment contained no separate count for the lesser included offense of aggravated assault precisely because aggravated assault is a lesser included offense. As this court held in White v. Maxwell (1963),
Therefore, the statutory mandate reiterated in
Reading the statutes this way does no violence to the salutary purpose of putting a defendant on notice that the prosecutor seeks an enhanced sentence for involving a firearm in the crime and that the defendant should prepare a defense accordingly.
Therefore, we agree with the conclusion of the Court of Appeals for Highland County that where a defen
The judgment of the court of appeals is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.