State v. LutzState v. Lutz
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Burch
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:The action is one for a declaratory judgment within the court’s jurisdiction in mandamus, determining the duty of the *622county clerk in respect to preparation of the ballot for the primary election to -be held on August 5, 1924.
At the general election in 1922, L. “J. Adkinson was elected County treasurer of Reno county for the term‘beginning October, 1923, and ending October, 1925. He failed to qualify, and-Frank Y. Lewis was appointed by the board of county сommissioners to fill the vacancy. A. E. Noonan has filed his declaration as a Republican candidаte for the primary election nomination for the unexpired term. Unless there is a vacancy to bе filled by election at the general election in November, 1924, for the unexpired term, and unless nomination of candidates to fill the vacancy must be made at the primary election, Noonan’s name has no place on the primary election ballot.
The filling of vacancies in all county offices is provided for by R. S. 25-312, which reads as follows:
“All vacancies in any state or county office, and in the. suprеme or district courts, unless otherwise provided for by law;-shall be filled by appointment from the governor, until the next general election after such vacancy occurs, when such vacancy shall be filled by election.”
The terms of office of persons chosen to fill vacancies is provided for by R. S. 25-314, which reads as follows:
“Any of said officers that may be elected or appointed to fill vacanciеs may qualify and enter upon the duties of their office immediately thereafter, and when elected they may hold the same during the unexpired term for which they were elected, and until their successors are elected and qualified; but if appointed, they shall hold the same only until their successors are eleсted and’ qualified.”
Applying these statutes, when Adkinson failed to qualify there was a vacancy in the office of county treasurer, to be filled by appointment extending to the general election of. 1924. At that еlection the vacancy is to be filled by the election of a person to hold during the unexpired tеrm, who may qualify and enter upon his duties immediately after election.
Since the legislature may make сhangi s in terms of office, R. S. ‘25-314 is subject to an implied proviso, as R. S. 25-312 is subject to the express proviso, “unless otherwise provided by law.” What ■other provision of law must be considered? It is conceded there is nonе except R. S. 19-504, which reads as follows:
“In case the office of county treasurer shall becomе vacant, the board of ■county commissioners shall appoint a suitable person to perfоrm the duties •of such treasurer, and the person so appointed, Tipon giving bond, with the *623like sureties and conditions as that required in county treasurer’s bonds,‘and in such sum as said board shall direct, shall be invested with all the duties of such treasurer until such vacancy shall be filled or such disability be removed.”
On one side it is contended that if рower of appointing to a county-office be vested elsewhere .than in the governor, R. S. 25-312 has nо further application to that office, and consequently R. S. 19-504 is complete so far as filling vacаncy in office of the county treasurer and term of the appointee are concernеd. On the other side it is con- . tended R. S. 25-312 and 25-314 are general provisions which control except so far as modified by other legislation, and in this instance R. S. 25-312 alone is modified to the extent only that the appointmеnt is to be made by the county commissioners. The court agrees with the latter view.
There waa good reason to transfer power of temporary appointment from the governor to the board оf county commissioners, which has general charge of county affairs, is able to act advisedly in all сases, and is able to act quickly in an emergency. There was no reason for making appointmеnt by the board of county commissioners instead of by the governor extend to end of term, notwithstanding a général election should supervene. R. S. 19-504 plainly contemplates a temporary filling of the office. The аppointee of the board of county commissioners is not vested with the duties’ of office to the end of the term, but merely until the vacancy is filled. Filled how? R. S. 25-312, the only statute on the subject, answers the question — by election at the next general election after vacancy occurs. R. S. 25-314, unqualified by R. S. 19-504, then fixes the time thе elected incumbent shall hold — during the unexpired term.
. Since vacancies in the office of county trеasurer are to be filled for the unexpired term at general elections only, nomination of candidates to fill such vacancies must be by primary election, under R. S. 25-201, and not under R. S. 25-301 and 25-302, which were superseded, so far as general elections were concerned, by the primary law.
The fact that candidаtes are to be nominated and elected for the regular term beginning in October, 1925, has no relevancy to the subject of filling the vacancy for the unexpired term.
On June 24, 1924, E. E. Woodson filed his declaration as a candidate for the unexpired term. His declaration having been filed *624after noon of June 20, is a nullity. (Bird v. Beggs, ante, p. 619, just decided.)
Declaratory judgment in accordance with the views which have been expressed.