History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Lumpkin
428 So. 2d 711
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court granting appellee Richard Lumpkin’s motion to suppress since it is apparent from this record that following his concededly valid arrest there was ample probable cause for the police search of the vehicle in question.1 See United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982).

Appellee Herbert L. Tuff has confessed error in this cause, and thus we likewise reverse as to him.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

. We note the trial judge did not have the benefit of the Ross decision at the time the motion was granted.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lumpkin
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 8, 1983
Citation: 428 So. 2d 711
Docket Number: No. 82-1238
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.