History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Lucarello
350 A.2d 226
| N.J. | 1975
|
Check Treatment
69 N.J. 31 (1975)
350 A.2d 226

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
QUINCY H. LUCARELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 3, 1975.
Decided December 3, 1975.

Mr. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., argued the cause pro se.

Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Anthony J. Fusco, Mr. Harry Robinson, III and Mr. Stephen Rosenfeld, Assistant Prosecutors, of counsel; Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in its majority opinion reported at 135 N.J. Super. 347 (1975).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lucarello
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 3, 1975
Citation: 350 A.2d 226
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.