History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Love
153 S.E.2d 381
N.C.
1967
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The appellant’s first assignment of error challenges the Court’s refusal to sequester the witnesses upon the appellant’s motion. The refusal was in the Court’s discretion and not reviewable. State v. Spencer, 239 N.C. 604, 80 S.E. 2d 670. Another assignment involved the admissibility of evidence. Any error in this respect was cured by the failure to place in the record the excluded evidence so the Court could determine its materiality. In one instance evidence of the same import was admitted without objection.

The record does not disclose any reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Love
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 22, 1967
Citation: 153 S.E.2d 381
Docket Number: 250
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.