State v. Love

Mar 22, 1967
250
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam
Per Curiam.

The appellant’s first assignment of error challenges the Court’s ‍‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‍refusal to sequester the witnesses upon the appellant’s motion. The refusal was in the Court’s discretion and not reviewable. State ‍‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‍v. Spencer, 239 N.C. 604, 80 S.E. 2d 670. Another assignment involved the admissibility of evidence. Any error in this respect ‍‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‍was cured by the failure to place in the record the excluded evidence so the Court could determine ‍‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‍its materiality. In one instance evidence of the same import was admitted without objection.

The record does not disclose any ‍‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‍reason why the verdict and judgment should be disturbed.

No error.