midpage

State v. LoteganoState v. Lotegano

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 21, 1934
Versions:173 A. 136
113 N.J.L. 176
1934 N.J. LEXIS 354

Memorandum by

Parker, J.

The case is submitted on briefs. The brief for plaintiff in error bears the name of a member of the bar who is a counselor-at-law, but who signs simply as attorney of record. Apart from this, we have not found it necessary, nor indeed possible, to go into the merits, because the case does not show any judgment of the Supreme Court, nor any writ of error out of this court, nor any assignment of error in this court.

Consequently there is nothing for us to review; and the writ of error — if there be one — is accordingly dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lotegano
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 21, 1934
Citations: 173 A. 136; 113 N.J.L. 176; 1934 N.J. LEXIS 354
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In