State v. Long, No. 87-762

No. 87-762 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Sep 29, 1987

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the writ of prohibition issued below which, on speedy trial grounds, precluded the continued prosecution of a DUI charge in the county court. The record shows that defense counsel specifically agreed to a trial date beyond the speedy trial time, thus effecting a waiver of the appellee’s rights under the rule.¹ See Smith v. State, 482 So. 2d 521" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1986-01-29" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-state-1941259?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1941259">482 So.2d 521 (Fla.2d DCA 1986), and cases cited.

1 . We point out that the 1984 changes in the speedy trial rule which eliminate the requirement of immediate discharge are inapplicable to misdemeanors. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(2).