History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Loesser
74 Ohio St. 3d 1510
Ohio
1996
Check Treatment

Cuyahoga County, No. 66762. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed December 5, 1995: “The motion of the appellant to certify a’ conflict between this Court’s decision and the judgment in State v. Trivedi (1982), 8 Ohio App.3d 412 [8 OBR 534, 457 N.E.2d 868], is hereby granted.

“The rule of law upon which this alleged conflict exists is whether the trial court, pursuant to R.C. 2951.02(B)(9) and R.C. 2951.02(C), has the authority to order restitution as a condition of probation as *1511compensation to the victim for injury, damage or loss .sustained other than property damage or the value of the property which is subject of any theft offense.”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 95-2439, infra.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Loesser
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 31, 1996
Citation: 74 Ohio St. 3d 1510
Docket Number: 95-2441
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.