History
  • No items yet
midpage
358 P.3d 328
Or. Ct. App.
2015
PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged, ORS 811.700; failure to appear on a criminal citation, ORS 133.076; and second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. We reject without written discussion defendant’s first and second assignments of error and write only to address his third assignment, which challenges the trial court’s imposition of a $60 “mandatory state amount” for each conviction. Defendant points out that the trial court imposed fines of $500 or $250 for each conviction, as allowed by ORS 153.633, and argues that there is no statutory authority to separately impose additional fines.1 The state concedes that the $60 “mandatory state amount” fees were imposed in error. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse the portion of the judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction.

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $60 for each conviction reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Notes

OES 153.633(1) provides:

“In any criminal action in a circuit court in which a fine is imposed, the lesser of the following amounts is payable to the state before any other distribution of the fine is made:
“(a) $60; or
“(b) The amount of the fine if the fine is less than $60.”

Defendant observes that the statute does not provide authority for the trial court to impose a fee but, rather, directs the first $60 (or the entire fine if less than $60) of whatever fine is imposed to be paid to the state.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Lindemann
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 12, 2015
Citations: 358 P.3d 328; 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 962; 272 Or. App. 780; 131354; A155636
Docket Number: 131354; A155636
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State v. Lindemann, 358 P.3d 328