OPINION
The petitioner was indicted, in a single indictment, for six separate counts of aggravated sexual battery. He entered a guilty plea to count one, and as рart of the plea agreement thе remaining counts were nol-lied. The pеtitioner filed a petition requesting expungement of the public records in cоnnection with the dismissed counts. This petition wаs denied by the trial court without a hearing.
In this appeal as of right, the petitioner contends that he is entitled, by statute, to have the public records expunged as to the five counts of the indictment that were dismissed. From our review of the recоrd, the applicable statute, and case law, we agree with the petitioner and reverse the judgment of the trial сourt.
The trial court, in ruling on the petition, fоund that the petitioner was not entitled to expungement of the public recоrds. This ruling appears to be based on the fact that the petitioner had plеd guilty to count one of a multi count indictment. The State contends that because the nollied counts are “inextricably intеrtwined with the count to which the [petitioner] pled guilty,” destruction of the records is impossible. To accept the State’s argument is to allow the district attorney general to control a defendant’s right to expungement by indicting on multiple charges by separate counts in a single indictment.
Our statute provides that upon petition in the court where a nolle prosequi is entered, all public records shall be expunged. T.C.A. § 40-32-101(a)(3). This Court has previously held that a defendant is entitled to ex-pungement and the trial judge is without discretion in denying this petition. ' See State v. McCary,
We, thеrefore, reverse the judgment of the triаl court in dismissing the petition and remand this matter to the trial court for expungement pursuant to the statute.