History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Leach
139 S.E.2d 257
| N.C. | 1964
|
Check Treatment
139 S.E.2d 257 (1964)
263 N.C. 242

STATE of North Carolina
v.
James Thomas LEACH and Arthur Leroy Legette.

No. 660.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 1964.

Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton and Asst. Atty. Gen. Richard T. Sanders, for the State.

Rudolph L. Edwards, Durham, for James Thomas Leach, defendant.

Lina Lee S. Stout, Durham, for Arthur Leroy Legette, defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Although defendants' primary defense was an alibi, his Honor inadvertently failed to charge on this substantive feature of the case. Defendants are entitled to have had the court apply the law to their evidence with respect to alibi. Under the authority of State v. Gammons, 258 N.C. 522, 128 S.E.2d 860, and State v. Spencer, 256 N.C. 487, 124 S.E.2d 175, defendants have the right to a new trial and it is so ordered.

New trial.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Leach
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 16, 1964
Citation: 139 S.E.2d 257
Docket Number: 660
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.