State v. LeachState v. Leach
DECISION AND JUDGMENT
* * * * *
Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jeffrey D. Lingo, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Ann M. Baronas, for appellant.
* * * * *
HANDWORK, J.
{¶ 1} This appeal is from the November 30, 2009 judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, which sentenced appellant, Marquis C. Leach, after he pled no
{¶ 2} “THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING APPELLANT TO A TERM OF INCARCERATION IN PRISON FOR A MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION.”
{¶ 3} Appellant was sentenced to a term of three years as to the charge of failure to comply and six months as to the lesser included offense of assault in prison, which were to be served consecutively. Appellant contends that the trial court made an error of law by sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of six months when a misdemeanor is only punishable by a term of incarceration of up to 180 days in jail.
{¶ 4} Appellee does not respond to this argument, but instead contends that
{¶ 5} Upon consideration of appellant‘s assignment of error, we find it well-taken.
{¶ 6} “A person who is convicted of or pleads guilty to one or more misdemeanors and who is sentenced to a jail term or term of imprisonment pursuant to the conviction or convictions shall serve that term in a county, multicounty, municipal, municipal-county, or multicounty-municipal jail or workhouse or, if the misdemeanor or misdemeanors are not offenses of violence, in a minimum security jail.”
{¶ 7} Thus, it is clear that the statute requires the term of incarceration for a misdemeanor cannot be ordered to be served in prison. Appellant‘s sole assignment of error is found well-taken.
{¶ 8} Having found that the trial court did commit error prejudicial to appellant and that substantial justice has not been done, the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is reversed. Pursuant to the authority granted to us by
JUDGMENT REVERSED.
Peter M. Handwork, J.
Arlene Singer, J.
Thomas J. Osowik, P.J.
CONCUR.
This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of Ohio‘s Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court‘s web site at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/?source=6.