State v. Lance

84 Ohio St. 3d 17 | Ohio | 1998

Lead Opinion

The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.

---

Concurrence in Part

Cook, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.