History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. La Roda
622 P.2d 756
Or. Ct. App.
1981
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-42, 368 P2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. La Roda
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jan 26, 1981
Citation: 622 P.2d 756
Docket Number: No. CR 79-0449, CA 18797
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.