99 Iowa 10 | Iowa | 1896
The defendant was a registered pharmacist during the time he is alleged to have committed the crime in question, but there is evidence which tends to show that he made sales of intoxicating liquors in violation of law. The questions we find it necessary to determine, arise on a motion for a new trial which was filed by the defendant, and overruled.
Other questions are presented in argument, but, as they are not likely to arise on another trial, will not be determined. The judgment of the district COUrt4s REVERSED.