State v. KuykendahlState v. Kuykendahl
Donald Kuykendahl was charged with offenses of forcible rape and aggravated burglary. After a trial a twelve-member jury found him not guilty on the burglary charge and guilty of the lesser included offense of sexual battery as to the rape charge. Subsequently, he pled guilty to being a multiple offender, waived all delays, and was sentenced to serve twenty years at hard labor without benefit of parole or good time. On appeal Kuykendahl argues that the trial court erred in denying him good time eligibility and denying him parole eligibility.
The record reflects that at approximately midnight on March 6, 1985, B.H. awoke in her room at the Orleans Hotel to find a man standing over her, pulling down the covers on her bed. Ms. H. screamed, and the man, later identified as the defendant Donald Kuykendahl, put his hand over her mouth, threatening to kill her if she resisted. He then raped her vaginally twice and forced her to perform oral sex on him. After the second rape, Kuykendahl laid back on the bed and fell asleep. Ms. H. then escaped from the room and fled down the stairs, where she called the police. Officers responding to her call discovered Kuykendahl asleep in Ms. H.’s bed and arrested him. Some costume jewelry and two $5.00 bills which belonged to Ms. H. were found in his pants pocket.
By his first assignment of error, Kuykendahl contends that the trial court erred by denying him eligibility for good time credits. In support, he cites
However, in State v. Williams,
The clear wording of the statute does not prohibit, nor does the jurisprudence indicate the legislature intended to take away the sentencing court’s discretion in prohibiting “good time” for habitual offenders convicted of felonies not enumerated in the statute. This discretion is still vested with the sentencing court. Id. at 1295.
See also State v. Black,
By his second assignment of error, Kuykendahl contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him without eligibility for parole because, pursuant to
... upon conviction of a second felony offense, such person shall be eligible for parole consideration upon serving one-half of the sentence imposed ...
Of course, the trial judge found that Kuykendahl had three previous felony convictions, and thus ordered that Kuykendahl be sentenced without benefit of parole pursuant to another provision contained in
... A person convicted of a third or subsequent felony and committed to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections shall not be eligible for parole.
(emphasis provided). Kuykendahl appears to argue that, because he was sentenced pursuant to
Kuykendahl’s assignment is, therefore, without merit.
For the foregoing reasons, Kuykendahl’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.