History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kruelski
247 Conn. 925
Conn.
1998
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 553 (AC 16967), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s prosecution was not barred by the double jeopardy clause of the federal constitution?”

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

G. Douglas Nash, public defender, in support of the petition. Robert L. Marconi, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kruelski
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Oct 22, 1998
Citation: 247 Conn. 925
Docket Number: SC 16029
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.