State v. Koopman, 519 So. 2d 613

BARKETT, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution to answer the question of great public importance certified in Koopman v. State, 507 So.2d 684, 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987):

May the quantity of drugs involved in possession or delivery of cocaine be used as a proper reason to support a valid departure from the sentencing guidelines?

In Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988), we held that the quantity of drugs involved in a crime cannot be a proper reason to support departure from the sentencing guidelines. Accordingly, we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Koopman

Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida

Date Published: Jan 28, 1988

Citations: 519 So. 2d 613; 1988 WL 6018; 70588

Docket Number: 70588

Court Abbreviation: Fla.