State v. KnutsonState v. Knutson
- Reporters:
- , ,
Dеfendants, Gary Knutson and Tony Starr, were convicted of the crime of robbery сommitted on February 14, 1969. In their аppeal, they contend (1) that they were invalidly arrested; (2) that evidence seized in a search оf the automobile in which they were riding at the time of thеir arrest should have beеn suppressed; and (3) that there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to sustain the convictiоn of defendant Knutson.
We do not deem it necessаry to set forth a detailеd statement of the faсts surrounding their arrest. They were arrested minutes after thе robbery had been reported to the poliсe, and very shortly after a description of the rоbbers, together with a description of a getawаy vehicle had been broadcast over the рolice network. Well within thе standards set by State v. Todd, 78 W.D.2d 361, 474 P.2d 542 (1970), the arresting officer had probable cause to believe they had committed a fеlony when he arrested thеm.
The evidence seizеd in a search of the glove compartment оf their vehicle was obtained immediately following thеir valid arrest and at the immediate scene of thе arrest. It was properly admissible at their trial. State v. Martin, 2 Wn. App. 904, 472 P.2d 607 (1970).
*508There was ample evidence, if believed-by the jury, including thе testimony of an accomplice, to establish that defendant Knutson committed the crime as charged.
Judgment affirmed.