History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Klugh
127 S.C. 429
S.C.
1924
Check Treatment

February 1, 1924. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The defendant was convicted in the County Court of Greenwood County, in February, 1923, under an indictment charging him with violation of the State Prohibition Law (Volume 2, Code 1922, c. 20). Upon appeal to the Court of General Sessions, the judgment was affirmed. He now appeals to this Court upon the sole ground, as his counsel state in their printed argument, that the act under which the County Court was established is unconstitutional in providing for a jury of six instead of twelve men.

In view of the provisions of Article 5, § 22, of the Constitution, "the jury in cases civil or criminal in all municipal *Page 430 Court, and Courts inferior to Circuit Courts shall consist of six," there is no ground for the contention. (It will be noted that in the reprint of the Constitution in the Code of 1922, Vol. 1, p. 557, the two words italicized above were inadvertently omitted.)

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the County Court be affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES WATTS, FRASER and MARION concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Klugh
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Feb 1, 1924
Citation: 127 S.C. 429
Docket Number: 11408
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.