History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kinney
683 N.E.2d 789
Ohio
1997
Check Treatment

Cuyahoga App. No. 71353. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Certificate of Conflict filed May 1,1997:

“Sua sponte. The judges of the Court of Appeals of the Eighth District of the State of Ohio hereby find that the judgment entered in this case is in conflict with the judgment pronounced upon the same question by another Court of Appeals, the same being the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County in the case of State v. Twicer (1994), 98 Ohio App.3d 308 [648 N.E.2d 557].

“Wherefore, the record in this cause, State v. Kinney, is hereby certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination. The issue for certification is:

“Whether [a] search warrant is invalid as to provision authorizing search of ‘all persons’ that were at residence during execution of search warrant, as it did not name or particularly describe any person or place.”

Resnick, J., not participating.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 97-1175, infra.

Resnick, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kinney
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 3, 1997
Citation: 683 N.E.2d 789
Docket Number: 97-1176
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.