midpage

State v. KerklinState v. Kerklin

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 13, 1990
No. 74811
Versions:566 So. 2d 513
15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465
1990 WL 132925
1990 Fla. LEXIS 1132
BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Kerklin v. State, 548 So.2d 689 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), which is in express and direct conflict with the Fifth *514District Court’s decision of Franklin v. State, 526 So.2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), approved in part, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989), disapproved in part, State v. Watts, 558 So.2d 994 (Fla.1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

The issue presented here was resolved adversely to the state in Watts. For the reasons stated in Watts, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kerklin
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 13, 1990
Citations: 566 So. 2d 513; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465; 1990 WL 132925; 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1132; No. 74811
Docket Number: No. 74811
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In