History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kenilworth
69 N.J.L. 674
N.J.
1903
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court, reported ante p. 114.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yoori-iees, Yroom, Green, Gray. 12; For reversal—None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kenilworth
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 16, 1903
Citation: 69 N.J.L. 674
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.