History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Kendall
96 Or. App. 735
Or. Ct. App.
1989
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

In a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. We hold that the court did not err in denying that motion. However, we reverse because of the lack of a written waiver of trial by jury.

Consent to be tried without a jury requires an express written waiver. Or Const, Art I, § 11; ORS 136.001. Although the state concedes that there is no written waiver in the record, it argues that, because defendant did not object or otherwise raise the issue in the trial court, he has not preserved the error for review. However, the error is apparent on the face of the record and we will consider it. ORAP 7.19(5). See State v. McDaniel, 96 Or App 337, 772 P2d 951 (1989).

Judgment reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Kendall
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: May 24, 1989
Citation: 96 Or. App. 735
Docket Number: C87-02-30946; CA A48220
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.