124 A. 37 | Conn. | 1924
Counsel for the accused filed a motion to correct the finding made by the trial court, and at the same time filed exceptions. The exceptions are to certain paragraphs of part I of the finding, and to the refusal of the court to find certain paragraphs of part II as requested in the draft-finding. The motion to correct does not contain reference to part I of the finding, but to the paragraphs set forth in part II of the exceptions, together with new matter not included in the draft-finding. The exception to part I cannot constitute a valid reason of appeal, since it is not a part of the motion to correct. Young v. Shetucket Coal Wood Co.,
The remedies open to the accused to secure a correction of the finding in a case tried to the jury were two: that under General Statutes, § 5836, and that under § 5829.State v. Klein,
The same practice prevails under § 5829 as under § 5830, except that § 5829 provides an additional remedy by way of exceptions. DeFeo v. Hindinger,
The method of correcting a finding provided by General Statutes, § 5832, is applicable to the correction of findings in a court case and not to a jury case. State
v. Klein,
The application of the appellant (the accused) is denied.