State v. Katz
130 A. 920 | N.J. | 1925
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.