State v. JonesState v. Jones
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Goodwin
The defendant appeals from a conviction of violating
The defendant formerly had been tried under an indictment charging a violation of
The defendant urges that, because both indictments described the same transaction, the two offenses for which he was successively prosecuted were in fact the same offense. We need not decide whether the defendant’s construction of the two indictments is correct, because this appeal is without merit in any event. Even if the two offenses had been identical,
We have always held that a criminal verdict on the merits will bar another prosecution for the same offense, and we have held that the discharge of a jury under circumstances in which jeopardy was not properly annulled by the trial court constitutes the equivalent of acquittal. See
State v. Chandler et al,
128 Or 204, 274 P 303 (1929). But it is settled in this state that if jeopardy is properly annulled for any reason, including the reasons set forth in
Affirmed.