Case Information
*1 NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
A RIZONA C OURT OF A PPEALS
D IVISION O NE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent , v.
DANNY JOSEPH JONES, Petitioner . No. 1 CA-CR 24-0053 PRPC FILED 03-11-2025 Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County No. CR-2020-00977
The Honorable Richard D. Lambert, Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED COUNSEL
Mohave County Attorney ’ s Office, Kingman
By Jacob Cote
Counsel for Respondent
Danny Joseph Jones, Eloy
Petitioner
STATE v. JONES Decision of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Vice Chief Judge Randall M. Howe, and Judge Andrew M. Jacobs delivered the decision of the Court.
PER CURIAM :
¶1 Danny Joseph Jones (“Petitioner”) seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post -conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is P etitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post -conviction relief, and the petition for review. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 Accordingly, we grant review but deny relief.
2