2007 Ohio 4458 | Ohio Ct. App. | 2007
The trial court's application of State v. Foster (2006),
109 Ohio St.3d 1 , at Appellant's resentencing hearing violated Appellant's rights as guaranteed by the Ex Post Facto and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. Appellant was entitled to the imposition of minimum, concurrent prison sentences, and the failure to impose such sentences deprived Appellant of his right to a jury trial as guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
{¶ 2} We have previously rejected the precise constitutional arguments that appellant raises here. See State v. Lariva, Franklin App. No. 06AP-758,
Judgment affirmed.
*1KLATT and TYACK, JJ., concur.