History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Johnson
287 S.C. 171
S.C.
1985
Check Treatment

ORDER

Appellant seeks a remand to the circuit court for the purpose of moving for a new trial. The motion is denied.

Appellant was tried and convicted of murder. His appeal is currently pending. Following his conviction and sentence, appellant entered into a post-conviction plea agreement whereby the solicitor’s office agreed not to oppose appellant’s motion for a new trial if appellant testified against his co-defendant. The solicitor agreed to allow appellant to plead to a lesser offense upon the grant of the motion. Appellant complied with the agreement and filed this motion.

The solicitor has broad discretion in choosing the offenses with which a defendant will be charged and in plea negotiations leading up to trial. See State v. Blackburn, 271 S. C. 324, 247 S. E. (2d) 334 (1978); Simmons v. State, 264 S. C. 417, 215 S. E. (2d) 883 (1975). However, the solicitor has no authority to enter into plea negotiations with regard to a charge for which a defendant has already been sentenced. The decision to grant a new trial is for the trial judge. S. C. Code Ann. § 17-23-110 (1976).

The post conviction plea agreement appellant relies upon in his motion is invalid. The motion is denied.

This order shall be published with the opinions of the Court.

Harwell, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Johnson
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Aug 5, 1985
Citation: 287 S.C. 171
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.