State v. JohnsonState v. Johnson
Defendant, Frederick Douglas Johnson, was charged with eight counts of forgery by bill of information.
In this case, neither the appellant nor the appellee filed briefs. For this reason the assignments of error designated by the defendant in the record are considered as abandoned. State v. Lemoine, 403 So.2d 1230 (La.1981); State v. Dewey, 408 So.2d 1255 (La.1982).
Under these circumstances the court‘s review is limited to a “mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings” to determine if
After a thorough review of the record, we find no patent errors.
For these reasons, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Notes
Scope of Appellate of Review. The following matters and no others shall be considered on appeal:
(1) An error designated in the assignment of errors, and;
(2) An error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.