State v. Jiminez

Apr 3, 1990
Versions:571 A.2d 295
118 N.J. 252
1990 N.J. LEXIS 27
PER CURIAM.

The judgment 229 N.J.Super. 256, 551 A.2d 191 is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in State v. Joseph Clay, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For affirmance — None.