midpage

State v. JenkinsState v. Jenkins

Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 15, 1967
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
McAllister
PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a ‍​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‍burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding ‍​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‍certain evidence.

No offer of proof was made and consequently, even *281 if ‍​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‍the evidence was admissible, we have no way of ‍​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‍determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial ‍​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‍to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Jenkins
Court Name: Oregon Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1967
Citations: 424 P.2d 894; 246 Or. 280; 1967 Ore. LEXIS 575
Court Abbreviation: Or.
Log In