The State brought this appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (8), seeking this Court’s review of the trial court’s grant of a motion for new trial on the ground that the evidence was legally insufficient for the jury to convict appellee Marcus Jackson of murder and related charges for the death of the victim Brandon Horton.
[wjhen evaluating the sufficiency of evidence [as a matter of law], the proper standаrd for review is whether a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt— [T]he evidеnce [is reviewed] in the light most favorable to the verdict, giving deference to the jury’s determination on the proper weight and credibility to be given the evidence.
Manuel v. State,
Construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows on August 8, 2007, appellee, who was a high school student, was at a social gathering in Union City. Appellee’s cousin alerted appellee that the victim was playing basketball near the cousin’s house in Fairburn. Appellee decided he wanted to confront the victim whom appellee believed had been “badmouthing” him and so appellee asked Eskie Christmas, who was in his thirties, to drive him to Fairburn. Christmas agreed аnd drove appellee and five other people from the social gathering to the Fairburn neighborhood where thе victim was playing basketball with three other teenagers. One of the passengers in Christmas’s vehicle testified that during the ride from Union City tо Fairburn, appellee pulled out a gun and cocked it. As soon as Christmas parked his SUV, witnesses testified appellee got out of the vehicle, walked over to the victim, and hit the victim with the gun, causing the victim to fall to the ground. Appellee then startеd beating the unarmed victim. Meanwhile, some of the other people in the SUV exited and commenced scuffling with the victim’s friends. Aрpellee dropped the gun and one of the victim’s friends said he tried to recover it but was unable to do so becausе one of the people from the SUV was holding him back. Ultimately, Christmas picked up the gun, and a shot was fired. After firing the gun, witnesses said Christmas threw the gun into a nearby driveway. As the victim lay bleeding to death with a gunshot wound to the back of the head, a
At trial, the medical examiner tеstified the cause of the victim’s death was a gunshot to the head. He stated there was stippling on the victim’s scalp around the gunshot wound, a finding which indicated the gun was six to twelve inches away from the victim when fired. The firearms expert testified that the gun, despite having been dropped, was in working order. Although the magazine had fallen out of the gun when appellee dropped it, thе gun still hada round in its chamber which caused the fatal shot. The firearms expert also said the gun had a heavy trigger pull.
In its order granting appellee’s motion for new trial, the trial court stated, “. . . there was no evidence that [appellee] directly сommitted or intentionally helped in the commission of the crimes charged.” We disagree with the trial court’s conclusion. “A pеrson who does not directly commit a crime may be convicted upon proof that the crime was committed and that person was a party to it.” Powell v. State,
Judgment reversed.
Notes
The crimes occurrеd on August 8, 2007. On November 16, 2007, appellee and his co-defendant Eskie Christmas were indicted by a Fulton County grand jury on charges of malicе murder, felony murder (aggravated assault), aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Appellee and Christmas were tried together on April 6 through April 9,2009, and a jury convicted them both on all сounts. The trial court denied both of appellee’s motions for a directed verdict. After his conviction, appellee moved for a new trial on April 20, 2009, and amended the motion on September 1, 2011, and on September 14, 2012. The trial court conducted a hearing on the motion for new trial, as amended, on September 14 and granted the motion on November 9, 2012, holding there wаs insufficient evidence as a matter of law to support the verdict.
See Ricketts v. Williams,
Specifically, the firearms expert stated that an average of eleven and a quarter pounds of force was required to be exerted on the trigger to cause the gun to fire.