State v. Hurt

Jun 27, 2013

505PA10

Reporters:: , , ,
Before:: Parker

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Dissenting Opinion

Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON

dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Hudson’s dissenting opinions in State v. Ortiz-Zape, _N.C. _, _ S.E.2d_ (2013) (329PA11) and State v. Brewington,__N.C._,_S.E.2d_(2013) (235PA10).

Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.