No. II-321 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Oct 4, 1978
The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee/defendant’s motion to discharge under the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(2). Defendant’s demand for speedy trial, filed prior to the filing of the-information, was a nullity and was ineffective as a demand for speedy trial entitling defendant to discharge under Rule 3.191(a)(2). State v. Gravlee, 276 So. 2d 480" date_filed="1973-04-18" court="Fla." case_name="State v. Gravlee">276 So.2d 480 (Fla.1973); State ex rel. Hanks v. Goodman, 253 So. 2d 129" date_filed="1971-10-06" court="Fla." case_name="State Ex Rel. Hanks v. Goodman">253 So.2d 129 (Fla.1971); State v. Hill, 299 So. 2d 625" date_filed="1974-06-18" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="State v. Hill">299 So.2d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), quashed in part 313 So. 2d 766" date_filed="1975-03-19" court="Fla." case_name="State v. Hill">313 So.2d 766 (Fla.1975). Accordingly, the order discharging defendant under the speedy trial rule is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.