midpage

State v. HumphreyState v. Humphrey

Ohio Supreme Court
Mar 30, 2011
2011-0054
Versions:

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant‘s second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Michael M. Ater, Ross County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard W. Clagg, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Humphrey
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 30, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 1426; 128 Ohio St. 3d 397; 2011-0054
Docket Number: 2011-0054
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In