History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Humphrey
128 Ohio St. 3d 397
Ohio
2011
Check Treatment

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HUMPHREY, APPELLANT.

No. 2011-0054

Supreme Court of Ohio

March 30, 2011

128 Ohio St.3d 397, 2011-Ohio-1426

Submitted March 1, 2011

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant‘s second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of

State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in
State v. Johnson
.

O‘CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Michael M. Ater, Ross County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard W. Clagg, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Humphrey
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 30, 2011
Citation: 128 Ohio St. 3d 397
Docket Number: 2011-0054
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.