History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hughes
8 N.C. App. 334
N.C. Ct. App.
1970
Check Treatment
VaughN, J.

The only exception and assignment of error brought forward upon this appeal is to the signing of the judgment. Counsel for defendant candidly admits that he has carefully examined the record and is unable to find prejudicial error therein, but asks this Court to review the record and to give to the defendant the benefit of any prejudicial error.

The appeal presents the case for review for error appearing on the face of the record. An exception to the judgment must fail if the judgment is within the statutory limits and is supported by the evidence, and there is no fatal defect appearing on the face of the record proper. 3 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 161, p. 112.

The record herein contains a bill of indictment, proper in form, charging the defendant with armed robbery in violation of G.S. 14-87. There is ample evidence to support the judgment and the sentence is well within the statutory limits. We have examined the record and find no error.

No error.

Campbell and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hughes
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: May 27, 1970
Citation: 8 N.C. App. 334
Docket Number: No. 7023SC301
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.