History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Huffman
16 N.C. App. 653
N.C. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
BRITT, Judge.

Although defendant’s brief does not comply with the rules of this court, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, with particular reference to the questions raised in the brief, but find no prejudicial error. We hold that defendant received a fair trial and the sentences imposed are within the limits provided by applicable statutes. G.S. 14-54; G.S. 14-72; G.S. 14-2.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Huffman
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 22, 1972
Citation: 16 N.C. App. 653
Docket Number: No. 7226SC632
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.