History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Howley
94 Or. App. 3
Or. Ct. App.
1988
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant’s conviction for harassment was reversed by this court for lack of evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the cause remanded for a new trial. State v. Howley, 92 Or App 575, 758 P2d 893 (1988). On motion for reconsideration, defendant argues that a retrial in this case is prohibited by the former jeopardy provisions of ORS 131.515; Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution; and the Fifth Amendment. The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered pursuant to a jury verdict or by the order of an appellate court. Or Const, Art I, § 12.

Motion for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified; remanded with instructions to dismiss complaint.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Howley
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 16, 1988
Citation: 94 Or. App. 3
Docket Number: 87-NB-1155; CA A47416
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.