History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Howard
31 Vt. 414
Vt.
1858
Check Treatment
Redfield, Ch. J.

We do not regard this court as having any control over this subject. Its jurisdiction, at present, is by statute limited to certain specified matters, the chief of which are hearing matters in error from the county court, chancery appeals, and that general supervision of inferior tribunals, and public officers, which are at common law exercised by the court of King’s Bench in England. .

The several county courts have exclusive jurisdiction of the trial of all persons charged with crime and criminal offences, above the jurisdiction of justices of the peace. If there is any power, any where, to grant this petition, it must reside in the county court for the county of Orange. But as the statute provides, in general terms, for the trial of criminal cases in the county where the offence is charged to have been committed, we do not perceive how any court could order a trial in such cases in any other county.

There will sometimes arise cases where a change of venue might be desirable, and this may be one of that class. But it will require the interference of the legislature before that can be done, and it is for them to determine when such provision becomes desirable.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Howard
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Nov 15, 1858
Citation: 31 Vt. 414
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.