midpage

State v. . HoustonState v. . Houston

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 5, 1876
Reporters:
Before:
Reads
Reads, J.

It was competent for his Honor to authorize the sheriff or other ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍person, to take the recognizance of the defendants for the appearance of the principal defendant at the next term, to answer the charge of ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍the State against him, his Honor having fixed the amount of the recognizance. And although the recognizance authorized to be taken was put in flie ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍form of a bond with conditions, signed and sealed by the defendants, yet it is valid as a recognizance.

The taking of a recognizance consists in ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍making and attesting a memorandum of the acknowledgment of a debt due the State, and of the conditions on which it is to be ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‍defeated. State v. Edney, 2 Winst., 71.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Pee Cdkiam. Judement affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Houston
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1876
Citation: 74 N.C. 549
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In