History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Horne
131 S.E. 753
N.C.
1926
Check Treatment
Stacy, C. J.

The appeal questions the constitutionality of chapter 18!), Private Laws 1925, which confers certain additional jurisdiction in criminal matters on the mayor’s court of the town of Farmville, Pitt County. The legislation is assailed by the defendant on the ground that it is in violation of Art. II, sec. 29 of the State Constitution, which provides: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local, private or special act or resolution relating to the establishment of courts inferior to the Superior Court,” etc. There is nothing in this section of the Constitution which prohibits the Legislature from increasing or decreasing the jurisdiction of these inferior courts already in existence. The prohibition is against the establishment of courts inferior to the Superior *376 Court, by any local, private or special act or resolution. This was tbe bolding in Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 9, and on authority of that case, tbe present ruling must be upheld.

Tbe only other exception appearing on the record has been covered by prior adjudications, and it needs no elaboration. S. v. Abernethy, 190 N. C., 768; S. v. Stallings, 189 N. C., 104.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Horne
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 10, 1926
Citation: 131 S.E. 753
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.