History
  • No items yet
midpage
877 S.W.2d 687
Mo. Ct. App.
1994

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal of Defendant’s appeals from his conviction for first degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion addressing Defendant’s direct appeal would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Nor would an opinion addressing the appeal from the denial of his 29.15 motion serve a prece-dential purpose. We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only detailing our reasons for affirmance.

Judgments affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Holmes
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 14, 1994
Citations: 877 S.W.2d 687; 1994 WL 256678; 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 975; Nos. 61448, 64805
Docket Number: Nos. 61448, 64805
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State v. Holmes, 877 S.W.2d 687