20100218 | N.D. | Jun 21, 2011
Filed 6/21/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 102" date_filed="2011-06-21" court="N.D." case_name="Interest of C.L.">2011 ND 102
In the Interest of C.L., a minor child
Natalie Anderson, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
C.L., minor child,
C.K., Mother,
C.L., Father,
Guardian Ad Litem Barb Oliger;
and the Executive Director of
Human Services Department of ND, Respondents
C.L., Father, Appellant
No. 20110111
Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bryan D. Denham (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), 411 North Fourth Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for appellant.
Interest of C.L.
No. 20110111
Per Curiam.
[¶1] C.L., father of the minor C.L., appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. C.L. argues the juvenile court made insufficient findings and improperly considered excluded evidence. The district court found that the minor C.L. was deprived and that he had been in foster care for over six hundred consecutive days. These findings are not clearly erroneous, and we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). See In re L.J. , 2007 ND 74, ¶ 2, 734 N.W.2d 342" date_filed="2007-05-01" court="N.D." case_name="Kessel v. Rutherford">734 N.W.2d 342 (“a court may terminate parental rights solely on a finding of (1) deprivation and (2) that the child has been in foster care . . . for at least four hundred fifty out of the previous six hundred sixty nights”) (quotations omitted).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner