midpage

State v. HerndonState v. Herndon

Indiana Supreme Court
May 20, 1839
Reporters:
,
Before:
Dewey
Dewey, J.

Indictment for assault and battery. The defendant pleaded in abatement that one of the grand ‍​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‍jurors who preferred the bill, and who had been selected as a talesman, was not a householder or freeholder. The state demurred; the demurrer was overruled, and the defendant discharged.

The Circuit Court ‍​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‍was correct in sustaining the plea. The statute regulating the mode of summoning grand and *76petit jurors, requires that the jurors be selected from the list of taxable persons, and that they be ‍​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‍good reputable freeholders or householders of the proper county. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 291. A talesman is such a person as is qualified to be on the original panel.

TY. Quarles, for the state. T. J. Evans, for the defendant.

If ‍​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‍a grand juror lack any of the qualifications required by the statute, it is a good cause of challenge ; or the defendant, before issue joined, may plead the objection in avoidance. ‍​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‍Vattier v. The State. 4 Blackf. 73.—1 Chitt. C. L. 308.—Bac. Abr. tit. Juries A.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Herndon
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 20, 1839
Citations: 5 Blackf. 75; 1839 Ind. LEXIS 8
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
Log In