Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s assessment to a prison term of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
