midpage

State v. HaynesState v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 10, 2004
2004-K-1893
Reporters:
,
Before:
Per Curiam (per curiam)

PER CURIAM.

Granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded for resentencing. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed only insofar as it amended defendant‘s sentence to include a fine ‍​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‍in the maximum amount of $5,000. R.S. 14:95.1(B) provides for a fine of not less than $1,000 and not more than $5,000. Because the amount of the fine lies in the trial ‍​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‍court‘s discretion, the court of appeal exceeded the scope of error patent review by amending the amount sua sponte instead of remanding the case to the trial court for resentencing. To the ‍​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‍extent that the amendment of defendant‘s sentence entails more than a ministerial correction of a sentencing error, the decision in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), 800 So.2d 790, does not sanction the sua ‍​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‍sponte correction made by the court of appeal on defendant‘s appeal of his conviction and sentence.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Haynes
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Dec 10, 2004
Citations: 889 So. 2d 224; 2004 WL 2827957; 2004-K-1893
Docket Number: 2004-K-1893
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In