State v. HastingsState v. Hastings
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Schwab
Upon trial by jury defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle,
The court in its discretion may require a convicted defendant to pay costs,
The remaining $33 was the type of expense “specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant,”
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Notes
“Costs shall be limited to expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant. They cannot include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made by the public irrespective of specific violations of law.”