State v. HannahState v. Hannah
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Manford
This appeal is from a conviction for assault, third degree, a Class A misdemeanor,
The sole question is whether reversible error occurred when the trial court permitted this case to go to trial without appellant’s being represented by counsel without first having executed a written waiver of counsel pursuant to
This judgment must be reversed. It serves no purpose to set forth a recitation of the pertinent facts. The appeal was submitted on briefs and respondent did not
The record fails to reveal any written waiver of counsel as mandated by § 600.-051. Reversal of the judgment is ruled squarely by our decision in State v. Hamilton, 647 S.W.2d 594 (Mo.App.1983). See also Peterson v. State, 572 S.W.2d 475, 477 (Mo. banc 1978); State v. Christian, 604 S.W.2d 758, 760 (Mo.App.1980); and Powell v. State, 581 S.W.2d 37 (Mo.App.1979). That this question is reviewable under our plain error rule 29.12(b), see Hamilton, supra.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
All concur.